Why Organic food may not healthier??

Spread the love. Share this article with your friends.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

People like to buy organic foods. They think organic food is better because it uses fewer pesticides. However, not all organic foods are healthy. Organic ice-cream and cookie are high in sugar and fat. Even, they are organic, they are still not healthy. Organic food has nothing to do with the tastes. It is just a more sustainable way to produce food.

Why Organic food may not healthier??

An ongoing argument I had with almost every “eating clean” I have ever encountered is organic food. Almost everyone who tries to eat healthy, at one point or another, decided to go for organic. It’s better for the environment, and get rid of all the nasty chemicals should be good for your health.

You see it everywhere. The first thing that every supporter paleo earnestly will tell you is that conventional farming causing everything from cancer to autoimmune diseases, and almost all in between. At first glance, online shows you the condemned GMO and pesticide left-right and center, with a selection of organic, seems safe in the ocean just privileged that cause disease.

Overall, it sounds as though the main factor of organic agriculture – the use of pesticides, non-GMO, etc. – may have health effects that so many people say organic giving.


Proof

Is organic better for your health has been the subject of much research. From small studies to see the animals and cells in the laboratory, we have seen quite a bit of questioning to large, well-controlled human intervention studies.

Several systematic reviews look at the potential health benefits of organic. A systematic review of studies in which scientists look at the whole body of literature, searching thousands of studies, sees what evidence and the position is.

And if we see a systematic review of organic food, we found the same answer time and again: organic food offers no health benefits whatsoever compared to conventionally-farmed foods. There is always no Organic food is not healthy for you than anything else.

A new large-scale study from Stanford University found that organic food, such as meat, milk, and the results, may not be worth the extra money when it comes to nutrition. While organic comes at a premium, the researchers say they are not healthy and significantly safer than conventional foods and grown along with pesticides.

Organic foods cost as much as a third more than conventional alternatives, with consumers shelling out extra money in the hope of purchasing healthier, more nutrient-dense foods. Researchers, “There is no difference between organic and conventional foods, if you’re an adult or mature and making a decision based solely on your health,” said Dena Bravata.

In reviews of thousands of papers, the researchers found that there is also no guarantee that organic food will be free of pesticides, even though it had a 30 percent lower rate compared to conventional products. Despite this, the review produced little evidence that conventional foods posed greater health risks than organic products. The researchers also found that the levels of pesticides of all foods generally fell within safety limits permitted. Two studies of children consuming organic and conventional diets find lower levels of pesticide residues in the urine of children on organic diets, though the significance of these findings on child health is unclear, the researchers noted.

The study results – the largest review of its kind comparing organic to conventional food – published 4 September in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine.

“Some people believe that organic food is always healthier and more nutritious,” stated co-researcher Crystal Smith-Spangler at Stanford School of Medicine. 

“We were a little surprised that we did not find any benefits.”

A separate new study from Oxford University in England found that organic farming may not be good for the environment. The researchers say that organic products such as milk, cereals, and pork produce more greenhouse gas emissions than their conventional counterparts. However, organic beef produced lower emissions. The study was published online on 4 September in the Journal of Environmental Management.

Spread the love. Share this article with your friends.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TOP